I prefer Move because even though it is basically the same as Wii, it is something that was proven to function and 'real' games [i.e.: games you can play for more than an hour straight, like Killzone 3] can be played with it. I just find that Kinect limits games too much.

Which of the two do you prefer and why?

OMG what's next?
Tom Vs. Jerry?

__________________
I would if I could, but I can't so I shan't

I prefer neither, because I already own a crappy Wii. If I wanted more motion gaming, I would buy more crappy Wii motion party game shovelware crap.

The only game I would use Kinect for, is probably Dance Central

and the move's games are too much like Wii's. And I dont want to play "normal" games with a motion controller.

lol Microsoft is so behind dude..
Nintendo and Soney are on there next new consoles
and Microsoft? Kinect Kinect Kinect Kinect Kinect.. Trust me i have a 360
now im (Homer Simpson)like Dope! >.<

Hmm... Wii isn't complete crap, man. A lot of great first-party games are on it...

Didnt say it was. Its just MOSTLY complete crap IMO.

Yeah, I agree. There's too much shovelware, but you don't have to buy it -_-

Exactly . Which is why I dont. My Wii hasnt been hooked up since 2009. Just waiting for Skyward Sword, and then I will sell the Wii (if anyone would even buy one anymore) or Ill give it to someone. Probably a charity of some sort.

Kinect would be my choice. If I wanted to use motion controls with a controller I'd use my Wii. Kinect on the otherhand can be really entertaining with full body motion.

For example nothing to me was more fun than playing ping pong and actually having to move left and right! Oh, and when I was playing ping pong on one leg vs a friend online was fun too.

I wasn't too impressed with kinect but maybe I'm not into the whole motion gaming thing...I think I just like the classic way better

__________________
"Some days you're the pigeon, and some days you're the statue."